"What Can We Do to Improve Peer Review in NLP?" by A. Rogers and I. Augenstein explained by Ms. Coffee Bean! Enjoy! ... and avoid the coping mechanisms from the wall of shame! 😅
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
🔥 Optionally, pay us a coffee to boost our Coffee Bean production! ☕
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/AICoffeeBreak
Ko-fi: https://ko-fi.com/aicoffeebreak
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Outline:
* 00:00 The importance of peer review
* 02:02 Peer review != quality
* 03:23 What reviewing really is
* 04:39 Coping mechanisms
* 07:27 The worst entry on the wall of shame
* 09:00 What to do?
📄 Paper explained: Rogers, Anna, and Isabelle Augenstein. "What Can We Do to Improve Peer Review in NLP?" Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Findings. 2020. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.findings-emnlp.112.pdf
🔗 Links:
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/AICoffeeBreak
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AICoffeeBreak
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/AICoffeeBreak/
#AICoffeeBreak #MsCoffeeBean #emnlp2020 #MachineLearning #AI #research
Video and thumbnail contain emojis designed by OpenMoji – the open-source emoji and icon project. License: CC BY-SA 4.0
00:00 The importance of peer review
02:02 Peer review != quality
03:23 What reviewing really is
04:39 Coping mechanisms
07:27 The worst entry on the wall of shame
09:00 What to do?
